<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ETS Live-Blog: Bruce Ware&#8217;s 2009 Presidential Address</title>
	<atom:link href="http://owenstrachan.com/2009/11/20/ets-live-blog-bruce-wares-2009-presidential-address/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://owenstrachan.com/2009/11/20/ets-live-blog-bruce-wares-2009-presidential-address/</link>
	<description>gospel calculus, with some whiz-bang</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:18:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Forrester</title>
		<link>http://owenstrachan.com/2009/11/20/ets-live-blog-bruce-wares-2009-presidential-address/#comment-3517</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig Forrester]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 01:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owenstrachan.com/?p=2166#comment-3517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the transcript, audio, or video of this address available anywhere?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.treehead.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Craig&lt;/a&gt;

--EOM]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the transcript, audio, or video of this address available anywhere?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.treehead.net/" rel="nofollow">Craig</a></p>
<p>&#8211;EOM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Ideas: Could Jesus have sinned?</title>
		<link>http://owenstrachan.com/2009/11/20/ets-live-blog-bruce-wares-2009-presidential-address/#comment-3483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Big Ideas: Could Jesus have sinned?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 13:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owenstrachan.com/?p=2166#comment-3483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and Beer Theology” – fun to talk about but not really important.  You can find the article by clicking here – but, I warn you, it is long and sort of difficult to grasp (I had to re-read several sections [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and Beer Theology” – fun to talk about but not really important.  You can find the article by clicking here – but, I warn you, it is long and sort of difficult to grasp (I had to re-read several sections [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ETS Highlights: The Moore Tour and More (Including Beignets) &#171; owen strachan</title>
		<link>http://owenstrachan.com/2009/11/20/ets-live-blog-bruce-wares-2009-presidential-address/#comment-2682</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ETS Highlights: The Moore Tour and More (Including Beignets) &#171; owen strachan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owenstrachan.com/?p=2166#comment-2682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] As readers of this blog know, I had the special pleasure of blogging Bruce Ware&#8217;s ETS presidential address.  I&#8217;ll remember that for a long time to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As readers of this blog know, I had the special pleasure of blogging Bruce Ware&#8217;s ETS presidential address.  I&#8217;ll remember that for a long time to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Few Highlights from ETS &#171; John Ploughman</title>
		<link>http://owenstrachan.com/2009/11/20/ets-live-blog-bruce-wares-2009-presidential-address/#comment-2680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Few Highlights from ETS &#171; John Ploughman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owenstrachan.com/?p=2166#comment-2680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  Owen Strachen live-blogged Bruce Ware&#8217;s presidential address on the humanity of Christ.  Owen did a superb job.  I [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Owen Strachen live-blogged Bruce Ware&#8217;s presidential address on the humanity of Christ.  Owen did a superb job.  I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perry Robinson</title>
		<link>http://owenstrachan.com/2009/11/20/ets-live-blog-bruce-wares-2009-presidential-address/#comment-2676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perry Robinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://owenstrachan.com/?p=2166#comment-2676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ware&#039;s account is the standard Reformed account more or less. You can find it in John Owen and others.

It does seem a bit adoptionistic though. There are other problems too it seems. Natures don&#039;t do anything and neither do they determine actions or execute them. Persons do that. Consequently, the reason Jesus couldn&#039;t have sinned is that he is a divine person who wills through his human will as well as through his divine will.   Ware&#039;s problem is that he is thinking of Christ&#039;s human power of choice as being gnomic or unfixed relative to the divine person. And that seems to give the impression that the human nature of Christ is itself a hypostasis.

I am curious if Ware mentions Christ&#039;s saying in the Passion of &quot;not my will.&quot; What were his comments if any regarding that?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ware&#8217;s account is the standard Reformed account more or less. You can find it in John Owen and others.</p>
<p>It does seem a bit adoptionistic though. There are other problems too it seems. Natures don&#8217;t do anything and neither do they determine actions or execute them. Persons do that. Consequently, the reason Jesus couldn&#8217;t have sinned is that he is a divine person who wills through his human will as well as through his divine will.   Ware&#8217;s problem is that he is thinking of Christ&#8217;s human power of choice as being gnomic or unfixed relative to the divine person. And that seems to give the impression that the human nature of Christ is itself a hypostasis.</p>
<p>I am curious if Ware mentions Christ&#8217;s saying in the Passion of &#8220;not my will.&#8221; What were his comments if any regarding that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

